The European Union has named Nigeria among countries posing serious concerns over intellectual property rights (IPR) violations.
In its latest biennial report, released Thursday by the EU Trade and Economic Security Commission, Nigeria joins a group that includes China, India, Türkiye, Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Indonesia, and Thailand on the bloc’s priority watch list for IPR enforcement issues.
The report, which assesses the global state of IPR protection, underscored the damaging impact of counterfeiting and piracy on the European economy. According to the EU, customs officials intercepted 17.5 million counterfeit goods in 2023, valued at nearly €811 million. In addition to the physical flow of fake products, the report highlighted a noticeable surge in online piracy activities.
The European Commission emphasized the significance of IPR-heavy industries, noting that they account for almost half of the EU’s annual GDP and over 80 percent of its total exports. These sectors are regarded as essential for maintaining economic stability and fostering long-term job creation across member states.
Among the countries ranked in the report, China was listed as the EU’s top concern regarding IPR violations, followed by India and Türkiye. Nigeria, along with Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Indonesia, and Thailand, falls under the third-priority category.
“China remains a top priority for EU efforts to protect the Intellectual Property Rights of its businesses, innovators or creators, followed closely by India and Türkiye as second priority countries. Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Indonesia, Nigeria and Thailand are third priority countries,” the commission stated.
While acknowledging efforts Nigeria has made, including the introduction of the Nigeria Customs Service Act and the launch of a national IP policy in 2022, the EU report noted that these reforms have not yet delivered sufficient improvements. One major obstacle cited was the failure to pass the long-pending Industrial Property Commission Bill, initially introduced in 2016. This bill was aimed at consolidating existing IP laws and establishing a centralized national industrial property commission.
The EU further criticized Nigeria’s legal framework, stating that the country has not fully incorporated international agreements such as the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement into national legislation. This omission, it said, leaves the intellectual property protection system fragmented and inadequate.
Administrative inefficiencies also featured in the report, particularly issues with Nigeria’s Patents and Designs Registry. The registry was described as outdated and slow, making it difficult for businesses to register trademarks and certification marks. Compounding this problem, the country has no dedicated mechanism for registering Geographical Indications (GIs), which complicates the protection of region-specific products.
“Nigeria continues to implement its National Intellectual Property Policy and Strategy adopted in 2022, which seeks to promote a comprehensive IP ecosystem as a catalyst for harnessing the full potential of IPR for socio-cultural development and sustainable economic growth,” the EU stated.
However, despite legislative steps such as the creation of an Online Copyright Inspectors Unit, stakeholders in the copyright sector reported that online piracy remains rampant. They also raised concerns about transparency and accountability in the operations of collective management organizations responsible for distributing royalties.
The report drew particular attention to Nigeria’s seaports, which it said act as key channels for the influx of counterfeit goods into West Africa. Many of these fake items, including pharmaceuticals, electronics, and fashion products, are reportedly shipped in from China before being distributed across the region.
“Nigeria’s major seaports serve as maritime gateways for the import of counterfeit products, including counterfeit medical products, mainly into West Africa. Nigeria is a transit point for fake electronics and electrical equipment manufactured in China for re-export to other West African countries,” it observed.
Beyond these challenges, the EU also pointed to systemic issues weakening IPR enforcement in Nigeria. These include limited financial resources, inadequate training for law enforcement agencies, and outdated infrastructure in the judiciary. Courts reportedly lack the technology and expertise to manage complex intellectual property cases, often leading to inconsistent decisions that undermine overall enforcement.
What you should know
The European Union has placed Nigeria on a priority watch list for weak enforcement of intellectual property laws, citing problems such as online piracy, outdated legal frameworks, and poor regulation of counterfeit imports through seaports.
Despite ongoing reforms, the EU says Nigeria must do more to align with global IP standards.
ALSO READ TOP STORIES FROM VERILY NEWS
